-12.9%
CHYM vs GLDM
+28.7%
-41.7%
-55.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | -1.7% | -2.6% | -3.9% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +0.7% | +1.3% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +11.0% | +0.3% | +10.7% | +11.0% |
| 3M | +83.9% | +0.7% | +83.2% | +83.0% |
| 6M | +45.3% | -15.4% | +60.8% | +46.1% |
| YTD | +28.4% | +1.0% | +27.4% | +26.3% |
| 1Y | +32.2% | +19.7% | +12.5% | +38.4% |
| All | -12.9% | +28.7% | -41.7% | -5.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling