+83.9%
CHYM vs CTAS
+13.0%
+70.9%
-7.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CTAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | 0.0% | -4.3% | -4.3% |
| 7D | +2.1% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +11.0% | -1.0% | +12.0% | +11.1% |
| 3M | +83.9% | +15.8% | +68.1% | +80.0% |
| All | +83.9% | +13.0% | +70.9% | +80.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CTAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CTAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CTAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CTAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling