-20.5%
CHWY vs UMAC
+22.7%
-43.2%
-39.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -2.5% | -0.6% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -13.6% | -3.4% | -10.2% | -13.5% |
| 30D | -8.5% | -15.1% | +6.5% | -8.4% |
| 3M | +8.9% | -10.8% | +19.7% | +9.2% |
| 6M | -20.5% | +15.7% | -36.1% | -21.3% |
| All | -20.5% | +22.7% | -43.2% | -21.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling