-33.5%
CHWY vs NIO
+55.3%
-88.8%
-87.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.3% | -1.4% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -1.9% | -6.7% | +4.8% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -20.0% | +18.9% | +2.8% |
| 3M | +15.5% | -30.5% | +45.9% | +22.8% |
| 6M | -8.5% | -20.7% | +12.2% | -6.2% |
| YTD | -29.6% | -25.7% | -3.9% | -27.2% |
| 1Y | -44.1% | -38.6% | -5.5% | -40.6% |
| 3Y | +1.2% | -62.3% | +63.5% | +9.6% |
| 5Y | -69.4% | -90.1% | +20.7% | -62.0% |
| All | -33.5% | +55.3% | -88.8% | -30.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling