-42.4%
CHTR vs GLDM
+1.2%
-43.7%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | +1.9% | +0.8% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +5.0% | -0.1% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +17.2% | -1.3% | +18.5% | +16.7% |
| 3M | -20.6% | -4.7% | -15.9% | -21.3% |
| 6M | -21.7% | -12.4% | -9.3% | -23.1% |
| YTD | -41.9% | -4.1% | -37.9% | -44.6% |
| All | -42.4% | +1.2% | -43.7% | -45.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling