+46.0%
CGNX vs ALHC
+146.3%
-100.4%
-55.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -2.1% | +1.8% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -5.8% | +7.3% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -3.3% | +1.5% | -1.6% |
| 3M | +5.3% | -37.9% | +43.2% | +8.3% |
| 6M | +22.3% | -29.5% | +51.8% | +23.7% |
| YTD | +72.2% | -35.4% | +107.6% | +75.0% |
| 1Y | +39.8% | -22.4% | +62.3% | +39.5% |
| All | +46.0% | +146.3% | -100.4% | +20.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling