+57.1%
CG vs LII
+5.3%
+51.8%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +1.2% | -2.8% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -4.3% | -0.7% | -3.6% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -5.1% | -12.6% | +7.5% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +8.7% | -24.4% | +33.1% | +21.0% |
| 6M | -9.2% | -28.7% | +19.5% | +3.4% |
| YTD | -18.9% | -19.1% | +0.3% | -14.3% |
| 1Y | -25.6% | -29.7% | +4.1% | -15.7% |
| All | +57.1% | +5.3% | +51.8% | +39.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling