+38.2%
CFG vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+138.1%
-18.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +4.0% | -4.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -4.1% | +3.5% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -22.7% | +18.2% | -4.4% |
| 3M | +6.3% | -62.5% | +68.8% | +5.8% |
| 6M | +20.6% | -99.5% | +120.1% | +26.2% |
| YTD | +21.2% | -99.7% | +121.0% | +27.8% |
| 1Y | +38.2% | -99.9% | +138.1% | +50.0% |
| All | +38.2% | -99.9% | +138.1% | +50.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling