+181.4%
CFG vs FDS
-27.9%
+209.3%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FDS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -3.5% | +3.4% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -1.9% | +3.4% | +1.8% |
| 30D | -3.8% | +9.0% | -12.8% | -5.2% |
| 3M | +11.5% | +18.9% | -7.4% | +8.2% |
| 6M | +19.2% | +35.1% | -15.9% | +12.0% |
| YTD | +23.7% | +5.5% | +18.2% | +24.8% |
| 1Y | +38.8% | -16.8% | +55.7% | +53.6% |
| All | +181.4% | -27.9% | +209.3% | +223.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FDS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FDS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FDS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FDS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling