+61.5%
CF vs NIO
-59.9%
+121.4%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +5.9% | -5.2% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -3.2% | +5.6% | -8.8% | -3.3% |
| 30D | +4.3% | -4.2% | +8.6% | +4.4% |
| 3M | +2.8% | -26.3% | +29.1% | +3.5% |
| 6M | +0.6% | -42.5% | +43.2% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +56.6% | -33.5% | +90.2% | +57.4% |
| 1Y | +49.6% | -52.7% | +102.3% | +53.4% |
| 3Y | +61.5% | -57.5% | +119.0% | +61.0% |
| All | +61.5% | -59.9% | +121.4% | +61.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling