+61.7%
CF vs NIO
-37.4%
+99.1%
-25.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -1.6% | -1.7% | -3.4% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -13.0% | +19.1% | +4.6% |
| 30D | +14.8% | -18.3% | +33.1% | +12.7% |
| 3M | +14.1% | -33.2% | +47.3% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +28.5% | -21.5% | +50.0% | +26.6% |
| YTD | +74.9% | -25.5% | +100.4% | +72.6% |
| 1Y | +61.7% | -38.0% | +99.7% | +65.0% |
| All | +61.7% | -37.4% | +99.1% | +65.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling