+639.5%
CEG vs NIO
-87.2%
+726.7%
-50.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | -1.6% | +6.4% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +8.0% | -13.0% | +21.1% | +9.2% |
| 30D | +12.9% | -18.3% | +31.2% | +14.7% |
| 3M | +13.2% | -33.2% | +46.4% | +16.8% |
| 6M | -7.0% | -21.5% | +14.5% | -5.9% |
| YTD | -15.0% | -25.5% | +10.5% | -13.7% |
| 1Y | -2.7% | -38.0% | +35.3% | -0.2% |
| 3Y | +184.1% | -65.5% | +249.5% | +197.9% |
| All | +639.5% | -87.2% | +726.7% | +717.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling