-25.1%
CDW vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+74.9%
-60.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -3.7% | +2.7% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -8.0% | +11.2% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +9.3% | -27.9% | +37.2% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +9.8% | -74.6% | +84.4% | +9.5% |
| 6M | +23.3% | -99.5% | +122.8% | +20.3% |
| YTD | +13.7% | -99.7% | +113.4% | +11.1% |
| 1Y | -6.5% | -99.9% | +93.4% | -8.3% |
| All | -25.1% | -100.0% | +74.9% | -27.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling