+185.4%
CDE vs KRMN
+17.6%
+167.8%
-47.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +2.6% | -1.4% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -11.8% | +8.6% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +9.5% | -43.0% | +52.5% | +31.7% |
| 3M | +25.5% | -28.8% | +54.3% | +39.0% |
| 6M | -7.9% | -66.3% | +58.5% | +28.3% |
| YTD | +15.6% | -51.8% | +67.3% | +44.7% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -44.7% | +78.7% | +60.3% |
| All | +185.4% | +17.6% | +167.8% | +159.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling