-99.2%
CCTG vs VOO
+66.0%
-165.2%
-99.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -0.5% | -3.0% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -0.4% | -2.2% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -19.6% | -1.4% | -18.2% | -18.0% |
| 3M | -65.3% | +3.7% | -69.1% | -66.3% |
| 6M | +36.2% | +13.0% | +23.2% | +19.3% |
| YTD | -59.7% | +12.4% | -72.1% | -64.5% |
| 1Y | -95.1% | +18.6% | -113.7% | -95.7% |
| All | -99.2% | +66.0% | -165.2% | -98.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling