+56.1%
CCL vs NTAP
+148.5%
-92.4%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.8% | -4.3% | -4.8% |
| 30D | -20.3% | -0.5% | -19.8% | -20.4% |
| 3M | -15.1% | +4.1% | -19.2% | -17.2% |
| 6M | -15.1% | +88.0% | -103.1% | -39.2% |
| YTD | -21.8% | +75.6% | -97.4% | -42.3% |
| 1Y | -24.8% | +58.9% | -83.7% | -41.4% |
| All | +56.1% | +148.5% | -92.4% | +0.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling