+47.5%
CCL vs IEMG
+81.5%
-34.0%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.0% | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -4.3% | -0.9% | -3.4% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -19.0% | +2.1% | -21.1% | -20.9% |
| 3M | -13.1% | +4.6% | -17.7% | -18.1% |
| 6M | -13.3% | +14.0% | -27.3% | -26.6% |
| YTD | -25.2% | +22.3% | -47.6% | -41.6% |
| 1Y | -27.2% | +30.7% | -57.9% | -47.4% |
| All | +47.5% | +81.5% | -34.0% | -32.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling