+47.5%
CCL vs FLNC
-63.7%
+111.2%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -4.2% | +3.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -4.3% | -5.0% | +0.7% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -19.0% | -26.1% | +7.1% | -16.7% |
| 3M | -13.1% | -55.2% | +42.1% | -6.9% |
| 6M | -13.3% | -42.6% | +29.3% | -11.5% |
| YTD | -25.2% | -51.0% | +25.8% | -23.6% |
| 1Y | -27.2% | +43.3% | -70.5% | -36.1% |
| All | +47.5% | -63.7% | +111.2% | +33.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling