-81.3%
CCG vs VOO
+79.2%
-160.5%
-99.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.5% | -0.6% | -12.0% | -12.9% |
| 7D | -7.2% | +0.5% | -7.7% | -6.9% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -0.9% | +0.7% | -0.9% |
| 3M | +2,647.1% | +3.9% | +2,643.2% | +2,695.1% |
| 6M | +1,696.2% | +14.5% | +1,681.6% | +1,642.4% |
| YTD | +1,588.0% | +13.0% | +1,575.0% | +1,548.6% |
| 1Y | +1,260.2% | +19.4% | +1,240.8% | +1,196.5% |
| All | -81.3% | +79.2% | -160.5% | -89.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling