+140.4%
CCEP vs TSLQ
-97.0%
+237.5%
-22.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TSLQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | +12.0% | -15.1% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -5.8% | +2.7% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -22.1% | +19.5% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +14.9% | +10.1% | +4.9% | +15.6% |
| 6M | +2.3% | -6.8% | +9.0% | +2.7% |
| YTD | +17.8% | +8.5% | +9.3% | +18.9% |
| 1Y | +24.2% | -49.7% | +73.9% | +23.3% |
| 3Y | +84.7% | -95.6% | +180.4% | +75.1% |
| All | +140.4% | -97.0% | +237.5% | +138.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TSLQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TSLQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TSLQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TSLQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling