+108.4%
CCEP vs NIO
-59.9%
+168.2%
-18.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +5.9% | -6.9% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +5.6% | -3.0% | +2.4% |
| 30D | +15.1% | -4.2% | +19.4% | +15.3% |
| 3M | +7.3% | -26.3% | +33.6% | +8.3% |
| 6M | +23.4% | -42.5% | +66.0% | +25.4% |
| YTD | +29.4% | -33.5% | +62.9% | +30.6% |
| 1Y | +34.2% | -52.7% | +86.9% | +37.1% |
| 3Y | +108.4% | -57.5% | +165.8% | +111.0% |
| All | +108.4% | -59.9% | +168.2% | +111.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling