+58.8%
CBRE vs UMAC
+488.3%
-429.4%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -3.2% | +2.0% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -7.2% | -4.0% | -3.2% | -7.2% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -9.4% | +3.0% | -6.4% |
| 3M | +2.9% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +2.5% | +27.2% | -24.7% | +0.6% |
| YTD | -14.2% | +84.7% | -98.9% | -17.1% |
| 1Y | -15.1% | +136.5% | -151.6% | -19.1% |
| All | +58.8% | +488.3% | -429.4% | +37.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling