+97.9%
CAT vs UMAC
+195.7%
-97.9%
-47.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -6.5% | +7.1% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +9.3% | +10.1% | -0.8% | +8.8% |
| 30D | -21.5% | -39.1% | +17.7% | -19.9% |
| 3M | -29.1% | -56.2% | +27.1% | -26.9% |
| 6M | -33.4% | -16.2% | -17.1% | -33.6% |
| YTD | +6.6% | -7.1% | +13.7% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | +6.5% | +10.3% | -3.7% | +4.1% |
| All | +97.9% | +195.7% | -97.9% | +92.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling