+222.9%
CAKE vs UMAC
+473.8%
-250.9%
-36.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -2.5% | +4.0% | +1.6% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -3.4% | -1.1% | -4.5% |
| 30D | -12.4% | -15.1% | +2.7% | -12.3% |
| 3M | +37.3% | -10.8% | +48.1% | +37.3% |
| 6M | +70.7% | +15.7% | +55.0% | +68.1% |
| YTD | +106.0% | +80.1% | +25.8% | +99.3% |
| 1Y | +79.7% | +116.7% | -37.1% | +71.8% |
| All | +222.9% | +473.8% | -250.9% | +192.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling