+140.2%
CAH vs UMAC
+508.0%
-367.8%
-20.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -6.4% | +6.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.2% | +3.3% | -5.5% | -2.2% |
| 30D | +1.2% | -10.4% | +11.6% | +1.2% |
| 3M | +13.1% | +1.8% | +11.3% | +13.1% |
| 6M | +8.5% | +40.7% | -32.3% | +8.5% |
| YTD | +17.6% | +90.9% | -73.3% | +17.8% |
| 1Y | +60.7% | +151.8% | -91.1% | +60.7% |
| All | +140.2% | +508.0% | -367.8% | +140.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling