+117.4%
CAH vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+216.5%
-20.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +6.6% | -8.2% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -5.1% | +24.8% | -29.9% | -5.1% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -59.2% | +57.5% | -1.5% |
| 3M | +9.4% | -56.9% | +66.2% | +9.7% |
| 6M | +9.2% | -57.6% | +66.8% | +9.5% |
| YTD | +15.7% | -73.6% | +89.3% | +16.3% |
| 1Y | +59.7% | -15.6% | +75.3% | +62.3% |
| All | +117.4% | -99.1% | +216.5% | +118.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling