-36.2%
CAG vs NIO
-62.2%
+26.0%
-56.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -3.8% | -13.0% | +9.3% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -18.3% | +21.4% | +3.2% |
| 3M | +23.5% | -33.2% | +56.7% | +23.6% |
| 6M | -14.8% | -21.5% | +6.6% | -14.7% |
| YTD | -5.4% | -25.5% | +20.0% | -5.3% |
| 1Y | -11.8% | -38.0% | +26.2% | -11.6% |
| All | -36.2% | -62.2% | +26.0% | -35.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling