+142.0%
C vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+241.3%
-31.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +2.6% | -2.9% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -29.7% | +33.3% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -65.3% | +65.3% | -4.8% |
| 3M | +2.4% | -57.3% | +59.8% | +0.2% |
| 6M | +24.9% | -61.6% | +86.6% | +23.1% |
| YTD | +19.8% | -78.3% | +98.1% | +17.0% |
| 1Y | +44.9% | -30.2% | +75.1% | +54.5% |
| All | +142.0% | -99.3% | +241.3% | +94.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling