+220.2%
BTSG vs MULL
+2,481.0%
-2,260.9%
-35.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.0% | -3.0% | +6.0% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +14.0% | -8.2% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +0.2% | +24.8% | -24.6% | -2.8% |
| 3M | +5.6% | -16.1% | +21.7% | +2.7% |
| 6M | +50.8% | +330.9% | -280.1% | +16.3% |
| YTD | +67.0% | +545.0% | -478.0% | +21.1% |
| 1Y | +145.5% | +2,427.1% | -2,281.6% | +45.1% |
| All | +220.2% | +2,481.0% | -2,260.9% | +66.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling