+112.4%
BTSG vs EPAM
-9.2%
+121.6%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +0.6% | -2.2% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +8.5% | -1.1% | +9.6% | +8.4% |
| 30D | +14.0% | +41.8% | -27.8% | +14.3% |
| 3M | +19.7% | +63.4% | -43.6% | +19.5% |
| 6M | +28.7% | +72.2% | -43.5% | +28.5% |
| YTD | +90.8% | -20.0% | +110.8% | +121.9% |
| 1Y | +112.4% | -9.0% | +121.4% | +135.6% |
| All | +112.4% | -9.2% | +121.6% | +135.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling