-99.5%
BTOG vs VT
+77.1%
-176.6%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -80.2% | +5.8% | -86.0% | -86.8% |
| 7D | -80.2% | +5.8% | -86.0% | -86.8% |
| 30D | -80.2% | +5.8% | -86.0% | -86.8% |
| 3M | -80.2% | +5.8% | -86.0% | -86.8% |
| 6M | -79.0% | +6.6% | -85.5% | -86.3% |
| YTD | -95.7% | +13.2% | -108.9% | -97.5% |
| 1Y | -98.1% | +13.5% | -111.6% | -98.9% |
| All | -99.5% | +77.1% | -176.6% | -99.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling