+105.1%
BTI vs CG
+48.1%
+57.0%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -4.0% | +2.5% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -6.4% | +4.0% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -4.8% | -7.1% | +2.3% | -4.5% |
| 3M | -8.1% | -1.6% | -6.5% | -8.1% |
| 6M | -4.2% | -8.3% | +4.1% | -3.9% |
| YTD | -1.3% | -23.8% | +22.5% | -0.4% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | -28.7% | +30.9% | +3.2% |
| All | +105.1% | +48.1% | +57.0% | +81.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling