-53.2%
BTDR vs NIO
-53.4%
+0.2%
-73.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.7% | -1.2% | +10.9% | +10.2% |
| 7D | +7.7% | -1.8% | +9.5% | +8.9% |
| 30D | -24.1% | -6.6% | -17.5% | -21.5% |
| 3M | -19.1% | -29.9% | +10.8% | -8.1% |
| 6M | -46.6% | -46.6% | 0.0% | -34.5% |
| YTD | -37.3% | -36.5% | -0.8% | -26.9% |
| 1Y | -53.2% | -51.1% | -2.1% | -34.6% |
| All | -53.2% | -53.4% | +0.2% | -34.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling