-11.0%
BTDR vs NIO
-38.9%
+28.0%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -2.4% | -0.3% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +14.8% | -4.1% | +18.9% | +16.6% |
| 30D | +41.8% | -23.2% | +65.0% | +56.5% |
| 3M | -29.2% | -29.9% | +0.7% | -19.2% |
| 6M | +66.2% | -25.1% | +91.3% | +80.1% |
| YTD | +10.0% | -27.5% | +37.4% | +20.7% |
| 1Y | -11.0% | -41.1% | +30.1% | +21.1% |
| All | -11.0% | -38.9% | +28.0% | +21.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling