-49.6%
BTDR vs NIO
-55.0%
+5.4%
-73.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.6% | -4.9% | -3.7% | -6.5% |
| 7D | -6.9% | -14.5% | +7.6% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -31.5% | -15.0% | -16.6% | -26.2% |
| 3M | -36.1% | -35.6% | -0.5% | -25.0% |
| 6M | -57.6% | -55.7% | -2.0% | -45.3% |
| YTD | -50.0% | -43.1% | -6.9% | -39.2% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | -53.5% | +3.9% | -32.8% |
| All | -49.6% | -55.0% | +5.4% | -32.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling