+3.1%
BTDR vs NIO
-37.4%
+40.5%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -1.6% | +5.5% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +20.0% | -13.0% | +33.0% | +26.3% |
| 30D | +11.9% | -18.3% | +30.2% | +20.5% |
| 3M | -36.9% | -33.2% | -3.7% | -26.5% |
| 6M | +56.5% | -21.5% | +78.0% | +66.5% |
| YTD | +10.4% | -25.5% | +35.9% | +20.1% |
| 1Y | +3.1% | -38.0% | +41.1% | +35.9% |
| All | +3.1% | -37.4% | +40.5% | +35.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling