-60.2%
BTDR vs LSCC
-16.2%
-44.0%
-73.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.3% | +7.1% | +6.1% | +7.0% |
| 7D | -10.4% | +13.0% | -23.3% | -18.0% |
| 30D | -42.2% | -19.8% | -22.3% | -30.0% |
| 3M | -42.8% | -18.4% | -24.4% | -32.3% |
| 6M | -60.2% | -16.1% | -44.1% | -51.6% |
| All | -60.2% | -16.2% | -44.0% | -51.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling