+56.5%
BTDR vs LSCC
+22.3%
+34.2%
-55.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | +2.0% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +20.0% | +1.3% | +18.7% | +18.8% |
| 30D | +11.9% | -9.7% | +21.6% | +21.9% |
| 3M | -36.9% | -23.7% | -13.2% | -23.4% |
| 6M | +56.5% | +26.5% | +30.0% | +28.9% |
| All | +56.5% | +22.3% | +34.2% | +28.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling