-85.9%
BTCZ vs VOO
+38.9%
-124.7%
-91.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +2.3% | +0.5% | +9.1% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +0.1% | +4.0% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +18.3% | -3.3% | +21.7% | +9.6% |
| 3M | -32.7% | -2.4% | -30.3% | -35.4% |
| 6M | -5.9% | +2.6% | -8.5% | +5.2% |
| YTD | -15.0% | +11.3% | -26.2% | +25.4% |
| 1Y | +10.7% | +13.4% | -2.8% | +73.0% |
| All | -85.9% | +38.9% | -124.7% | -59.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling