-86.9%
BTCZ vs VOO
+41.7%
-128.6%
-91.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | -0.4% | +4.8% | +3.4% |
| 7D | -7.3% | +0.1% | -7.4% | -6.6% |
| 30D | -37.6% | +0.1% | -37.7% | -37.3% |
| 3M | -43.6% | +2.0% | -45.6% | -39.4% |
| 6M | -31.5% | +13.0% | -44.5% | -0.5% |
| YTD | -21.1% | +13.6% | -34.7% | +20.2% |
| 1Y | +6.1% | +20.1% | -14.0% | +89.1% |
| All | -86.9% | +41.7% | -128.6% | -60.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling