-34.8%
BSX vs UMAC
+473.8%
-508.6%
-60.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -2.5% | +2.2% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -10.1% | -3.4% | -6.7% | -10.1% |
| 30D | -16.4% | -15.1% | -1.3% | -16.4% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -10.8% | +1.9% | -8.9% |
| 6M | -38.3% | +15.7% | -53.9% | -38.6% |
| YTD | -54.9% | +80.1% | -135.1% | -55.4% |
| 1Y | -58.8% | +116.7% | -175.5% | -59.4% |
| All | -34.8% | +473.8% | -508.6% | -37.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling