+34.1%
BP vs GLDM
+128.8%
-94.7%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.9% | +1.4% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +3.9% | -0.5% | +4.5% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +7.6% | +4.4% | +3.2% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +0.7% | -1.1% | +1.8% | +0.9% |
| 6M | +15.5% | -13.7% | +29.2% | +19.0% |
| YTD | +30.8% | +2.8% | +28.1% | +28.2% |
| 1Y | +34.3% | +24.8% | +9.5% | +22.9% |
| All | +34.1% | +128.8% | -94.7% | -8.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling