+1.8%
BND vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+101.8%
-18.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +4.0% | -4.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -4.1% | +4.0% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -22.7% | +22.5% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -0.7% | -62.5% | +61.8% | -0.7% |
| 6M | -1.7% | -99.5% | +97.8% | -1.6% |
| YTD | -0.5% | -99.7% | +99.2% | -0.4% |
| 1Y | +0.4% | -99.9% | +100.3% | +0.5% |
| 3Y | +13.1% | -100.0% | +113.1% | +13.5% |
| 5Y | -2.1% | -100.0% | +97.9% | -1.7% |
| All | +1.8% | -100.0% | +101.8% | +2.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling