-1.3%
BND vs EPAM
-77.4%
+76.2%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -3.9% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +13.4% | -13.3% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +47.1% | -44.8% | +1.8% |
| 3M | -0.2% | +71.2% | -71.4% | -0.8% |
| 6M | -1.0% | +48.9% | -49.9% | -1.5% |
| YTD | -0.4% | -22.2% | +21.9% | -0.3% |
| 1Y | -0.1% | -5.2% | +5.0% | -0.2% |
| 3Y | +15.1% | -34.9% | +50.1% | +15.2% |
| All | -1.3% | -77.4% | +76.2% | +0.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling