+223.1%
BMNR vs ZETA
+129.7%
+93.4%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | -1.2% | +4.7% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -3.7% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +39.9% | +5.7% | +34.2% | +34.6% |
| 3M | +51.5% | +50.4% | +1.1% | +11.1% |
| 6M | +18.9% | +65.5% | -46.6% | -23.1% |
| YTD | -7.8% | +48.3% | -56.1% | -36.6% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | +45.4% | -93.0% | -63.3% |
| All | +223.1% | +129.7% | +93.4% | -10.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling