+219.7%
BMNR vs PLD
+33.0%
+186.7%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +0.8% | -1.6% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -0.9% | +6.8% | +5.8% |
| 30D | +31.6% | -1.2% | +32.8% | +31.4% |
| 3M | +47.0% | -2.3% | +49.3% | +47.1% |
| 6M | +31.2% | +4.5% | +26.7% | +34.0% |
| YTD | -8.8% | +10.1% | -18.9% | -1.5% |
| 1Y | -43.4% | +25.9% | -69.3% | -25.9% |
| All | +219.7% | +33.0% | +186.7% | +471.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling