+223.1%
BMNR vs NXT
+44.9%
+178.1%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +1.9% | +1.5% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -1.9% | +2.1% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +39.9% | -20.0% | +60.0% | +30.5% |
| 3M | +51.5% | -30.7% | +82.3% | +31.7% |
| 6M | +18.9% | -29.0% | +47.9% | +7.7% |
| YTD | -7.8% | -4.8% | -3.0% | +18.2% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | +22.8% | -70.4% | +42.8% |
| All | +223.1% | +44.9% | +178.1% | +97.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling