+223.1%
BMNR vs NVT
+145.8%
+77.3%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +4.6% | -1.2% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +4.1% | -3.8% | -2.0% |
| 30D | +39.9% | -5.1% | +45.0% | +43.2% |
| 3M | +51.5% | -1.2% | +52.7% | +49.5% |
| 6M | +18.9% | +46.6% | -27.7% | -6.6% |
| YTD | -7.8% | +60.0% | -67.8% | -29.0% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | +70.8% | -118.4% | -54.0% |
| All | +223.1% | +145.8% | +77.3% | +1,227.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling