+223.1%
BMNR vs NOC
+7.4%
+215.6%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +0.8% | -0.5% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +39.9% | -9.7% | +49.6% | +55.3% |
| 3M | +51.5% | -5.6% | +57.2% | +57.0% |
| 6M | +18.9% | -28.6% | +47.5% | +90.1% |
| YTD | -7.8% | -7.9% | +0.1% | -21.7% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | -9.5% | -38.1% | -54.9% |
| All | +223.1% | +7.4% | +215.6% | -63.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling