+212.3%
BMNR vs NIO
-2.5%
+214.8%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -3.2% | +3.2% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -8.5% | -7.3% | -1.3% | -7.0% |
| 30D | +33.8% | -22.5% | +56.3% | +41.1% |
| 3M | +54.7% | -30.9% | +85.6% | +66.9% |
| 6M | +16.7% | -37.2% | +53.9% | +28.5% |
| YTD | -10.9% | -29.8% | +18.9% | -2.9% |
| 1Y | -46.9% | -37.4% | -9.5% | -33.5% |
| All | +212.3% | -2.5% | +214.8% | +2,058.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling