+212.3%
BMNR vs MSFU
-9.6%
+221.9%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSFU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.3% | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -8.5% | -6.9% | -1.6% | -4.7% |
| 30D | +33.8% | -5.1% | +38.9% | +37.6% |
| 3M | +54.7% | +44.6% | +10.1% | +19.8% |
| 6M | +16.7% | +32.8% | -16.1% | -7.0% |
| YTD | -10.9% | -10.1% | -0.8% | +3.3% |
| 1Y | -46.9% | -19.4% | -27.5% | -25.5% |
| All | +212.3% | -9.6% | +221.9% | +226.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSFU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSFU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSFU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSFU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling