+223.1%
BMNR vs LULU
-70.5%
+293.5%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LULU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +2.2% | +1.3% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -1.6% | +1.9% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +39.9% | -18.1% | +58.0% | +58.5% |
| 3M | +51.5% | -18.8% | +70.3% | +70.9% |
| 6M | +18.9% | -39.2% | +58.1% | +71.6% |
| YTD | -7.8% | -52.4% | +44.6% | +69.3% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | -40.3% | -7.3% | -32.7% |
| All | +223.1% | -70.5% | +293.5% | +4,503.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LULU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LULU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LULU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LULU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling