+223.1%
BMNR vs LNT
+15.2%
+207.9%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -1.0% | +1.3% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +39.9% | -4.2% | +44.2% | +42.3% |
| 3M | +51.5% | -6.7% | +58.2% | +53.4% |
| 6M | +18.9% | -3.6% | +22.5% | +16.1% |
| YTD | -7.8% | +5.9% | -13.7% | -23.2% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | +7.3% | -54.9% | -57.0% |
| All | +223.1% | +15.2% | +207.9% | +39.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling