+222.3%
BMNR vs HTZ
-62.3%
+284.6%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | +1.3% | -6.9% | -5.5% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +7.5% | -2.6% | +5.4% |
| 30D | +35.5% | +47.4% | -12.0% | +40.0% |
| 3M | +39.6% | -54.9% | +94.5% | +28.5% |
| 6M | +18.2% | -47.0% | +65.2% | +18.3% |
| YTD | -8.0% | -55.3% | +47.2% | -13.2% |
| 1Y | -40.8% | -57.6% | +16.8% | -44.3% |
| All | +222.3% | -62.3% | +284.6% | +127.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling